Displaying items by tag: Edward Torres

“Henry Johnson,” David Mamet’s new play running at the vintage Biograph Theatre, is like many of his works, enigmatic and demanding of his audience. With Mamet one must pay close attention to the dialog, packed with foreshadowing and reveals. Miss a line or even a word, and you’ll miss out.

This focus on the dialog is the essence of what Mamet’s works are about - plumbing the interior workings of the characters, as they face their lives. It also allows Mamet to examine in depth the forces at play in any human interaction, which in my take the playwright sees as transactional.

Expectations were clearly high for the Midwest premier of “Henry Johnson” by the Pulitzer winning Chicago playwright (“Glengarry Glen Ross,” “American Buffalo”) and screenwriter (“The Untouchables,” “Hoffa,” “The Postman Always Rings Twice”).

The biggest letters are Mamet’s name on the marquee at the Biograph. This is Victory Gardens Theater's home, where it is celebrating 50 years with this show. Its legendary founder, Dennis Zacek, takes executive producer credits on the production.

The promise of a rare new stage work by Mamet (as well as its planned release this summer as a film starring Shia LeBoeuf) drew a strong team of pros as well:
Directed by Edward Torres (co-founder of Teatro Vista), it stars Thomas Gibson (TV’s “Criminal Minds”), Keith Kupferer (“Ghostlight”) as a prison guard, Al'Jaleel McGhee (“A Soldier’s Play” Broadway tour) as Mr. Barnes and “Chicago PD” character Daniil Krimer as Henry.

“Henry Johnson” has what people come to David Mamet for - the thinking script, the demands on audiences to fill in the dots, the mystery, the unexpected reversals. For me, what is most intriguing about “Henry Johnson” is how Mamet explores a character, Henry, a beta male who is readily susceptible to being dominated by alpha male personalities.

It opens as Mr. Barnes, Henry’s boss, questions him on his unusual request: to find a job for a parolee that Henry once knew in college. McGhee’s Barnes digs into Henry’s motivation, asking him “What attracted you?” Henry’s answer: “He had this power over women,” relating how he could pick up women in bars and go home with them easily.

Barnes is hard driving, suggesting to Henry that he is under the spell of this one-time college buddy (who never appears in the play), now a convicted felon. Barnes gets Henry to state he is not physically attracted to this guy, just under his thumb.

Henry can accuretly relate back to Barnes his assessment of him - that Henry is putting the welfare of a past friend ahead of the interests of the company. Henry can hear it, but presumably he is so much in thrall to this “friend” he cannot be persuaded to discard him.

“You saw him after college?” Barnes asks.
Henry: “Before he went to prison.”
Barnes: “He was grooming you.”

The unseen friend was also a steady winner in card games, inexplicably lucky. Barnes ventures that the other men, also dominated by the friend’s charisma, let him win. “They were paying him rent.” In my experience, this is really how the dynamics of unhealthy male social hierarchy can work. When Barnes asks what he thought about his friend’s conviction, Henry replies, “I had no opinion. I thought it was my responsibility to have no opinion.”

In an abrupt change of scene, we now find Henry newly arrived at a prison cell - Barnes caught him embezzling, presumably for this unseen friend, and the audience must conclude he’s been convicted. Henry’s cellmate, Gene (Thomas Gibson) digs into Henry enough to determine his untoward fealty to his friend. Then he lectures him continuously, and Henry offers only desultory replies. As with Barnes, Henry is able to relate back to Gene, “You think my interest {in him] is an addiction.”

The setting shifts to the prison library, and the guard in charge is played by Kupferer. And then finally, a climactic scene, also in the prison library, where Mamet ties up the story for us, in a shocking end..

True to Mamet, the dialog doesn’t lead us through a plot - but an examination of where the characters are emotionally at key points along a timeline. Abrupt shifts in the setting are unexplained - Mamet expects us to figure it out, and we like him for that - but he’s not giving much to go on in each quadrant of the play: an inquiry in an office; a prison cell; a prison library; and a closing setting that spoiler concerns will leave undescribed.

The script seems less a play, than an extended treatment for a screenplay. The dialog  is less compelling than Mamet’s signature works, which take a lot of rehearsal to refine the playwright’s intended cadences. Kupferer and McGhee come closest to getting this down. With all that, it’s Mamet, and so “Henry Johnson” comes highly recommended. It runs through May 4 at Victory Gardens Theater.

*This review is also featured on https://www.theatreinchicago.com/!